Rep. Steve King’s defense of his dog-fighting statements only getting worse

Pushing back against media criticism and an excoriating routine from comedian Stephen Colbert, U.S. Rep. Steve King this morning clarified his opposition to federal legislation on animal fighting.

King, a Republican from Iowa, opposes a federal prohibition on watching animal fights or inducing someone else to do so, he said, because state laws are sufficient to police such crimes and because the federal government doesn’t have the resources to commit to enforcement.

“I’m saying the states do a good job of regulating and enforcing animal fighting,” King said. “They’re not coming to me saying that they need the help. It’s a province of the states. It is the concept of federalism is for the states to regulate these things, not for the federal government to do so.”

King also questioned the federal government’s authority to enact laws regarding animal fighting, and questioned whether such practices even occur.

“There’s no federal nexus in what goes on in an animal fight, if they actually take place anymore — I’m not hearing that they do,” he said. “Can anyone give me a list of animals fights that have taken place in Iowa? No, they’re against the law.”

The comments, which came during a speaking engagement at the Greater Des Moines Partnership, follow statements in which King has provided less legalistic explanations of his opposition to the measure, which was offered as an amendment to the farm bill currently under consideration in Congress.

In a tele-townhall meeting last month, King likened animal fighting – like dog- or cockfights – to fights between people, and said it would be wrong to restrict animal fighting while fights among people – like boxing, or martial arts, perhaps – are allowed to continue.

“It’s wrong to rate animals above human beings,” King said.

The comments caused a frenzy in the liberal-leaning press, with outlets like Think Progress and Wonkette sharply criticizing King’s comments. The attention ratcheted up with a 4-minute bit this week by comedian and faux news host Stephen Colbert of the Comedy Central show “The Colbert Report.”

In most cases, the stories drew a distinction lacking in King’s analogy: humans have a choice in deciding to fight; animals do not.

In Colbert’s bit, he mockingly lauded King for “standing up to the puppy huggers” and castigated the congressman for appearing to justify cruelty to animals by the existence of cruelty enacted by humans on one another. The segment became progressively raunchier, and ended with a photo-illustration merging King’s face with that of a puppy.

When the issue came up at the Partnership this morning, King said the entire controversy amounted to a “completely irrational hyperventilation from the left.”

When asked about Colbert’s routine specifically, King dismissed the comedian.

“I recall Steve Colbert testifying before the Judiciary Committee in the House of Representatives and obscenely insulting Iowans,” he said, referring to a 2010 hearing in which Colbert suggested the phrase “corn packer” was a “derogatory term for a gay Iowan.”

“So I don’t pay any attention to him anymore,” King said. “He’s in a separate league.”

by  Jason Noble

Link

About these ads

About Animal Connection

At the heart of animal rights, and animal welfare is the knowledge that animals are sentient beings, capable of suffering and feeling pain. Animal Connection aims to bring awareness to the injustices animals endure on a daily basis.
This entry was posted in Animal News, Pets. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Rep. Steve King’s defense of his dog-fighting statements only getting worse

  1. rali74 says:

    Reblogged this on Wisconsin Wildlife Ethic-Vote Our Wildlife and commented:
    This guy, Scott Suder, and George Meyer should hook up. They seem like soul mates. And people actually vote these clowns into office?

  2. m. mixson says:

    King is an idiot. A passionate blood lusting greedy person. How many dog fighting rings does he support? Something is amiss and his mentally challenged brain is not the thought processing one of a caring person. Dogs can not say “this hurts”. Let us put him in a ring with an opponent of his size and let him fight until one is dead, since he loves the sight of blood and guts.

  3. Sandra McGee says:

    When they (who ever that might be) were handing out brains – they forgot to give one to this idiot.

  4. Sorry, I’ve already been blocked from king’s facebook page. He doesn’t want to hear from any of us, nor will he address the issue with us. Coward needs to crawl back under his rock

Say Something!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s